From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 7/8] wt-status: load diff ui config Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 22:30:48 -0700 Message-ID: <7vmygqiozb.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <20081026043802.GA14530@coredump.intra.peff.net> <20081026044935.GG21047@coredump.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Johannes Sixt , Matthieu Moy , git@vger.kernel.org To: Jeff King X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Oct 27 06:32:28 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KuKiI-0001RE-Av for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Mon, 27 Oct 2008 06:32:26 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751523AbYJ0FbK (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Oct 2008 01:31:10 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751501AbYJ0FbK (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Oct 2008 01:31:10 -0400 Received: from a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([207.106.133.19]:55888 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751379AbYJ0FbJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Oct 2008 01:31:09 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B5E8749A7; Mon, 27 Oct 2008 01:31:09 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (ip68-225-240-211.oc.oc.cox.net [68.225.240.211]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 30220749A4; Mon, 27 Oct 2008 01:30:54 -0400 (EDT) User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 75ABEDC6-A3E8-11DD-901A-9CEDC82D7133-77302942!a-sasl-fastnet.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Jeff King writes: > But it makes me a little nervous. On one hand, I think it is definitely > the right thing for "status -v" to respect user options. But we do > several _other_ diffs in addition, and those are more "plumbing" diffs. > I think they should probably at least have diff_basic_config (e.g., for > rename limits). But we are applying the diff_ui_config options to all > diffs. Looking over the available options, I _think_ there are no nasty > surprises. But you never know. Up to 6/8 are indisputably good changes. The next one means well, and this one is a requisite step for it, but I agree that this feels somewhat risky.