From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: "Ping Yin" <pkufranky@gmail.com>
Cc: "Roman Shaposhnik" <rvs@sun.com>,
"Avery Pennarun" <apenwarr@gmail.com>,
stuart.freeman@et.gatech.edu, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Intricacies of submodules
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 15:32:14 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7vmyo0owep.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 46dff0320804110904w531035f4w79c1889bc90c09ee@mail.gmail.com
"Ping Yin" <pkufranky@gmail.com> writes:
> On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 1:20 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
>> > Some of it is personal, yes. But sometimes those personal preferences
>> > need to be enforced on a project level (of course, giving everybody
>> > a way to override the setting if they really want to). For a big
>> > software organization with a mix of senior and junior engineers I need
>> > a way to set up *my* workspace in such a way that everybody who
>> > clones/pulls from it get not only the source code, but also "Git best
>> > practices". That would simplify things a great deal for me, because
>> > I can always say: "just pull my latest .gitconfig, make sure you
>> > don't have any extra stuff in your .git/confing and everything
>> > in Git will work for you".
>>
>> I think the way you stated the above speaks for itself. The issue you are
>> solving is mostly human (social), and solution is majorly instruction with
>> slight help from mechanism. The instruction "Use this latest thing, do
>> not have anything in .git/config" can be substituted with "Use this latest
>> update-git-config.sh which mucks with your .git/config to conform to our
>> project standard", without losing simplicity and with much enhanced
>> robustness, as you can now enforce that the users do not have anything
>> that would interfere with and countermand your policy you would want to
>> implement.
>>
> But, how to handle the case that there are more than one policies
> for different projects?
"How to"? You would handle the case just like either of us suggested
above.
Are you talking about a single project with more than one policies A, B,
C, ... that conflict with each other? Or are you talking about more than
one projects, each of which has a single project-wide policy?
I do not think the former makes sense and won't be helped with in-tree
file that overrides .git/config Roman discussed either.
The latter would be helped equally well whether that in-tree polic file is
called .gitconfig or update-git-config.sh.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-11 22:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-31 20:59 Migrating svn to git with heavy use of externals D. Stuart Freeman
2008-04-08 18:07 ` D. Stuart Freeman
2008-04-08 20:06 ` Avery Pennarun
2008-04-08 20:49 ` D. Stuart Freeman
2008-04-08 21:01 ` Avery Pennarun
2008-04-08 22:47 ` D. Stuart Freeman
2008-04-09 3:03 ` Roman Shaposhnik
2008-04-09 3:33 ` Avery Pennarun
2008-04-09 4:39 ` Roman Shaposhnik
2008-04-09 6:34 ` Avery Pennarun
2008-04-09 6:43 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-04-10 3:43 ` Intricacies of submodules [was: Migrating svn to git with heavy use of externals] Roman Shaposhnik
2008-04-10 5:53 ` Intricacies of submodules Junio C Hamano
2008-04-10 20:32 ` Roman Shaposhnik
2008-04-11 5:20 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-04-11 16:04 ` Ping Yin
2008-04-11 22:32 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2008-04-12 3:13 ` Roman Shaposhnik
2008-04-12 5:11 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-04-14 19:52 ` Roman Shaposhnik
2008-04-15 1:13 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-04-15 2:13 ` Ping Yin
2008-04-16 3:49 ` Roman V. Shaposhnik
2008-04-17 18:09 ` Jeremy Maitin-Shepard
2008-04-17 19:06 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-04-17 20:04 ` Junio C Hamano
[not found] ` <32541b130804181128j57d76edcsbbd5fb8d4c782ae7@mail.gmail.com>
2008-04-18 18:30 ` Avery Pennarun
2008-04-17 19:50 ` Roman V. Shaposhnik
2008-04-17 20:06 ` Martin Langhoff
2008-04-17 20:44 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-04-17 21:00 ` Sverre Rabbelier
2008-04-17 21:25 ` Martin Langhoff
2008-04-17 21:27 ` Sverre Rabbelier
2008-04-17 21:31 ` Martin Langhoff
2008-04-18 1:41 ` Ping Yin
2008-04-17 22:29 ` Dmitry Potapov
2008-04-17 22:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-04-18 1:48 ` Ping Yin
2008-04-18 14:02 ` Jakub Narebski
2008-04-12 3:20 ` Ping Yin
2008-04-14 19:56 ` Roman Shaposhnik
2008-04-12 4:02 ` Ping Yin
2008-04-12 5:25 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-04-12 6:26 ` Ping Yin
2008-04-10 16:07 ` Intricacies of submodules [was: Migrating svn to git with heavy use of externals] Ping Yin
2008-04-10 19:27 ` Roman Shaposhnik
2008-04-09 19:57 ` Roman Shaposhnik
2008-04-09 20:27 ` Avery Pennarun
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7vmyo0owep.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=apenwarr@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pkufranky@gmail.com \
--cc=rvs@sun.com \
--cc=stuart.freeman@et.gatech.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).