From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: Integration branching Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2008 11:49:33 -0700 Message-ID: <7vmyo4mbb6.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <7vod8lpnpb.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <32541b130804071132q24acff6an853730af4fc7273e@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: "Avery Pennarun" , git@vger.kernel.org To: "Kai Hendry" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Apr 08 20:50:42 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JjIu0-0006u1-Dq for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Tue, 08 Apr 2008 20:50:40 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753084AbYDHSty (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Apr 2008 14:49:54 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753134AbYDHSty (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Apr 2008 14:49:54 -0400 Received: from a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([207.106.133.19]:45449 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753026AbYDHSty (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Apr 2008 14:49:54 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 327B210BA3; Tue, 8 Apr 2008 14:49:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (ip68-225-240-77.oc.oc.cox.net [68.225.240.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 327C510A0C; Tue, 8 Apr 2008 14:49:43 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Kai Hendry's message of "Tue, 8 Apr 2008 14:56:53 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: "Kai Hendry" writes: > I need http:// to work as some of the engineers I work with are behind > a "corporate firewall" that doesn't allow ssh://. Crazy, I know. It is not "crazy", but simply is "unfortunate". I am not involved in http-push at all myself, but I recall there was somebody working on improving it recently?