From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] solaris test results Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 21:29:11 -0800 Message-ID: <7vmyptpniw.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <20080220235944.GA6278@coredump.intra.peff.net> <7vk5kz171q.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <20080221004146.GA6682@coredump.intra.peff.net> <7vr6f5pnmz.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Whit Armstrong , git@vger.kernel.org To: Jeff King X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Feb 22 06:30:03 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JSQTy-0004V3-1d for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Fri, 22 Feb 2008 06:30:02 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750995AbYBVF31 (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Feb 2008 00:29:27 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751372AbYBVF31 (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Feb 2008 00:29:27 -0500 Received: from a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([207.106.133.19]:58490 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750892AbYBVF30 (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Feb 2008 00:29:26 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EC37364C; Fri, 22 Feb 2008 00:29:25 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (ip68-225-240-77.oc.oc.cox.net [68.225.240.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E1F1364A; Fri, 22 Feb 2008 00:29:19 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <7vr6f5pnmz.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> (Junio C. Hamano's message of "Thu, 21 Feb 2008 21:26:44 -0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Junio C Hamano writes: > Jeff King writes: > >> On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 04:34:25PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> ... >>> It is unfair to call diff without -u "totally broken". It is >>> not even in POSIX yet IIRC. >> >> Fair enough (and you are right that it is not even POSIX). Is it >> something we want to work around? We "diff -u" quite a bit in the test >> suite. > > Here is a possible solution. I have another one that converts "cmp" and "cmp -s" to the same test_compare_expect, but I do not think it is worth posting here. I'll either apply both or discard both. Haven't decided.