* git-rev-parse incorrectly uses --default parameter when invalid revision is supplied
@ 2008-01-07 23:38 Brandon Casey
2008-01-08 0:21 ` Junio C Hamano
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Brandon Casey @ 2008-01-07 23:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: git
When rev-parse is called with an invalid revision parameter and
--default has been used to set a default revision, the output
will be based on the parameter to --default.
For example:
This likely fails:
$ git rev-parse --verify foobar
fatal: Needed a single revision
This likely succeeds but probably should fail:
$ git rev-parse --verify --default refs/heads/master foobar
b2e62a7dc6ba20a354d7590bf6a1d9264de7efe3
The documentation for rev-parse says:
--default <arg>::
If there is no parameter given by the user, use `<arg>`
instead.
git-stash uses this command, so a typo could cause the wrong stash
to be applied.
git stash apply stsh@{1}
If stash@{0} exists, it will be applied which is definitely not
what the user would want.
It is not straight forward to me how to modify builtin-rev-parse.c
to fix this.
-brandon
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: git-rev-parse incorrectly uses --default parameter when invalid revision is supplied
2008-01-07 23:38 git-rev-parse incorrectly uses --default parameter when invalid revision is supplied Brandon Casey
@ 2008-01-08 0:21 ` Junio C Hamano
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Junio C Hamano @ 2008-01-08 0:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Brandon Casey; +Cc: git
Brandon Casey <casey@nrlssc.navy.mil> writes:
> When rev-parse is called with an invalid revision parameter and
> --default has been used to set a default revision, the output
> will be based on the parameter to --default.
>
> For example:
>
> This likely fails:
> $ git rev-parse --verify foobar
> fatal: Needed a single revision
>
> This likely succeeds but probably should fail:
> $ git rev-parse --verify --default refs/heads/master foobar
> b2e62a7dc6ba20a354d7590bf6a1d9264de7efe3
>
>
> The documentation for rev-parse says:
> --default <arg>::
> If there is no parameter given by the user, use `<arg>`
> instead.
>
>
> git-stash uses this command, so a typo could cause the wrong stash
> to be applied.
>
> git stash apply stsh@{1}
>
> If stash@{0} exists, it will be applied which is definitely not
> what the user would want.
>
> It is not straight forward to me how to modify builtin-rev-parse.c
> to fix this.
Two points.
* The description for --default you quoted says "no parameter",
but it should read "no non-flag rev parameter".
* --verify needs to be whole lot more special cased in the
codepath;
Currently, --verify just runs the command as if it was not
specified at all, but dies (1) as soon as it sees a second
non-flag rev arg (worse --- it dies *after* emitting it!), or
(2) at the end if it notices it did not emit any. It does not
even barf if you say "git rev-parse --verify ^HEAD", which I
think is a misdesign.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-01-08 0:22 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-01-07 23:38 git-rev-parse incorrectly uses --default parameter when invalid revision is supplied Brandon Casey
2008-01-08 0:21 ` Junio C Hamano
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).