From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: Errors pushing tags in "next" Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 21:18:10 -0700 Message-ID: <7vmz24sid9.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <7vr6rgsmj2.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <483641.20752.qm@web31801.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: ltuikov@yahoo.com X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Mar 23 05:18:30 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HUbEQ-0006gc-Lb for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Fri, 23 Mar 2007 05:18:27 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1422678AbXCWESP (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Mar 2007 00:18:15 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1422686AbXCWESO (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Mar 2007 00:18:14 -0400 Received: from fed1rmmtao102.cox.net ([68.230.241.44]:48391 "EHLO fed1rmmtao102.cox.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1422673AbXCWESM (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Mar 2007 00:18:12 -0400 Received: from fed1rmimpo01.cox.net ([70.169.32.71]) by fed1rmmtao102.cox.net (InterMail vM.7.05.02.00 201-2174-114-20060621) with ESMTP id <20070323041811.EVKI28911.fed1rmmtao102.cox.net@fed1rmimpo01.cox.net>; Fri, 23 Mar 2007 00:18:11 -0400 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.5.247.80]) by fed1rmimpo01.cox.net with bizsmtp id e4JA1W00d1kojtg0000000; Fri, 23 Mar 2007 00:18:10 -0400 In-Reply-To: <483641.20752.qm@web31801.mail.mud.yahoo.com> (Luben Tuikov's message of "Thu, 22 Mar 2007 20:35:55 -0700 (PDT)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Luben Tuikov writes: > --- Junio C Hamano wrote: > >> Luben Tuikov writes: >> >> > Is this of any concern? >> >> Sorry, I cannot tell without a command line. > > Sorry, I didn't include that. It is: > > git-push --tags web > > Luben >> >> > ### Pushing version 'v2.6.21-rc4' to the masses >> > fatal: ambiguous argument 'v2.6.21-rc3-329..bac6eefe96204d0ad67d144f2511a6fc487aa594': unknown >> > revision or path not in the working tree. >> > Use '--' to separate paths from revisions >> > fatal: ambiguous argument 'v2.6.21-rc3-329..bac6eefe96204d0ad67d144f2511a6fc487aa594': unknown Well, *I* don't say '### Pushing version blah to the masses', so it's hard to diagnose from this output. Is it coming from some of your own script (perhaps update hook on the receiving end)?