From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH] git-pickaxe: blame rewritten. Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 15:20:08 -0700 Message-ID: <7vmz81kwh3.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <7v7iz5rk4b.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <20061012193107.44651.qmail@web31805.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Oct 13 00:35:33 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GY8uZ-0001Wm-DO for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Fri, 13 Oct 2006 00:20:19 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751209AbWJLWUL (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Oct 2006 18:20:11 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751203AbWJLWUL (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Oct 2006 18:20:11 -0400 Received: from fed1rmmtao11.cox.net ([68.230.241.28]:33712 "EHLO fed1rmmtao11.cox.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751206AbWJLWUJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Oct 2006 18:20:09 -0400 Received: from fed1rmimpo01.cox.net ([70.169.32.71]) by fed1rmmtao11.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.06.01 201-2131-130-101-20060113) with ESMTP id <20061012222008.YXJN13992.fed1rmmtao11.cox.net@fed1rmimpo01.cox.net>; Thu, 12 Oct 2006 18:20:08 -0400 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.5.247.80]) by fed1rmimpo01.cox.net with bizsmtp id ZaKx1V01H1kojtg0000000 Thu, 12 Oct 2006 18:19:58 -0400 To: Luben Tuikov In-Reply-To: <20061012193107.44651.qmail@web31805.mail.mud.yahoo.com> (Luben Tuikov's message of "Thu, 12 Oct 2006 12:31:07 -0700 (PDT)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Luben Tuikov writes: > Junio, is it possible to also print the "previous" commit? > I mean, is it tenable to print the commit such that > a "git-diff C B -- A:file" will give a diff of the block of lines > we're looking at? There is no single "previous" in general. Which side of the merge would you take?