From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Move code resolving packed refs into its own function. Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 13:33:10 -0700 Message-ID: <7vmz8hccxl.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <20060930220158.d331bb7c.chriscool@tuxfamily.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Sep 30 22:33:24 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GTlWO-0004l1-1p for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 22:33:16 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751120AbWI3UdN (ORCPT ); Sat, 30 Sep 2006 16:33:13 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751944AbWI3UdN (ORCPT ); Sat, 30 Sep 2006 16:33:13 -0400 Received: from fed1rmmtao04.cox.net ([68.230.241.35]:52892 "EHLO fed1rmmtao04.cox.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751120AbWI3UdM (ORCPT ); Sat, 30 Sep 2006 16:33:12 -0400 Received: from fed1rmimpo02.cox.net ([70.169.32.72]) by fed1rmmtao04.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.06.01 201-2131-130-101-20060113) with ESMTP id <20060930203311.ENOP6711.fed1rmmtao04.cox.net@fed1rmimpo02.cox.net>; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 16:33:11 -0400 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.5.247.80]) by fed1rmimpo02.cox.net with bizsmtp id UkZD1V0021kojtg0000000 Sat, 30 Sep 2006 16:33:14 -0400 To: Christian Couder In-Reply-To: <20060930220158.d331bb7c.chriscool@tuxfamily.org> (Christian Couder's message of "Sat, 30 Sep 2006 22:01:58 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Christian Couder writes: > This patch move Linus' packed refs resolving code from > "resolve_ref" into a new "resolve_packed_ref" extern > function so that it can be reused when needed. I think we are stepping on each other's toes. How far into the process of making correct branch deletion are you?