From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH] gitweb: Use File::Find::find in git_get_projects_list Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 09:42:33 -0700 Message-ID: <7vmz924cxy.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <200609140839.56181.jnareb@gmail.com> <200609140959.04061.jnareb@gmail.com> <7vvenq4wgp.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <200609141201.41711.jnareb@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Sep 14 18:42:58 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GNuIQ-0000Dm-Cy for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Thu, 14 Sep 2006 18:42:38 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750700AbWINQmf (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Sep 2006 12:42:35 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750705AbWINQmf (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Sep 2006 12:42:35 -0400 Received: from fed1rmmtao03.cox.net ([68.230.241.36]:60354 "EHLO fed1rmmtao03.cox.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750700AbWINQmf (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Sep 2006 12:42:35 -0400 Received: from fed1rmimpo01.cox.net ([70.169.32.71]) by fed1rmmtao03.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.06.01 201-2131-130-101-20060113) with ESMTP id <20060914164234.DGQY2704.fed1rmmtao03.cox.net@fed1rmimpo01.cox.net>; Thu, 14 Sep 2006 12:42:34 -0400 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.5.247.80]) by fed1rmimpo01.cox.net with bizsmtp id NGiP1V0091kojtg0000000 Thu, 14 Sep 2006 12:42:23 -0400 To: Jakub Narebski In-Reply-To: <200609141201.41711.jnareb@gmail.com> (Jakub Narebski's message of "Thu, 14 Sep 2006 12:01:41 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Jakub Narebski writes: > Sorry, this comment was leftover from before, when no_chdir was not > used. Then $_ was the last part of directory,... Ah, thanks. I missed that difference. Did you choose to use no_chdir for performance reasons or coding convenience (somehow I had an impression that no_chdir would be slower)? > Sorry for the confusion. By index I meant alternate way of specyfying > projects,... Again, thanks for clarification. I forgot about the handcrafted project index file gitweb uses. > First of all, why duplicated repositories are considered > error? ... it is not that something bad would happen if there > are duplicated repositories. Fair enough, and I agree that that is a sane reasoning. Thanks.