From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove more gcc extension usage. Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 01:10:13 -0700 Message-ID: <7vmzbhdgnu.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <20060708183402.GA17644@spearce.org> <7vy7v4orpt.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <20060708190327.GA17763@spearce.org> <20060709073155.GP22573@lug-owl.de> <20060710052255.GA15173@spearce.org> <1152512523.3504.28.camel@dv> <20060710062513.GZ22573@lug-owl.de> <1152514328.3504.58.camel@dv> <20060710073532.GA22573@lug-owl.de> <20060710040711.z1h4w0wsgk8sskg4@webmail.spamcop.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Jul 10 10:10:23 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FzqqS-0007OL-Lg for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Mon, 10 Jul 2006 10:10:21 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751254AbWGJIKQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Jul 2006 04:10:16 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751353AbWGJIKQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Jul 2006 04:10:16 -0400 Received: from fed1rmmtao11.cox.net ([68.230.241.28]:15260 "EHLO fed1rmmtao11.cox.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751254AbWGJIKO (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Jul 2006 04:10:14 -0400 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.4.9.127]) by fed1rmmtao11.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.06.01 201-2131-130-101-20060113) with ESMTP id <20060710081014.RELX554.fed1rmmtao11.cox.net@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>; Mon, 10 Jul 2006 04:10:14 -0400 To: Pavel Roskin In-Reply-To: <20060710040711.z1h4w0wsgk8sskg4@webmail.spamcop.net> (Pavel Roskin's message of "Mon, 10 Jul 2006 04:07:11 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Pavel Roskin writes: > Going all the way to strict c89 could be too much, but fixing > initializers in a few places is a minor issue. Users of the > Sun's compiler can expect us to do such changes,... I am fully with you on this one.