From: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
To: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] send-email: allow sendmail binary to be used instead of SMTP
Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 02:47:31 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7vmzdjtya4.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060515092704.GB6855@localdomain> (Eric Wong's message of "Mon, 15 May 2006 02:27:04 -0700")
Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net> writes:
> I believe this is what Martin wanted. I think it's a good idea since
> sendmail binaries tend to be more flexible, but I'm ok with it either
> way.
I am not opposed to have an option to run a local submission
agent binary (I said I like that if(){}else{} there, didn't I?).
The ability to do so is a good thing. I am not however sure
about changing the default when no option is specified on the
command line.
>> > + if ($smtp_server =~ m#^/#) {
>>
>> I like this if(){}else{} here, but have a feeling that the
>> logging part should be placed outside it to be shared.
>
> Cleaned that up a bit, patch coming. Also removed the Port: printout
> completely, as it's rather redundant (see below).
>
>> While we are at it, we might want to enhance $smtp_server parsing
>> to take host:port notation so that people can use message
>> submission port 587/tcp (RFC 4409) instead.
>
> This already works, IO::Socket::INET (behind Net::SMTP) takes care of
> it :)
Thanks. Maybe the next option would be delivery to a file (or
even SMTP batch)? ;-)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-05-15 9:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-05-15 2:32 [PATCH] send-email: allow sendmail binary to be used instead of SMTP Eric Wong
2006-05-15 2:34 ` Eric Wong
2006-05-15 2:38 ` [PATCH] send-email: quiet some warnings Eric Wong
2006-05-15 6:04 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-05-15 9:41 ` [PATCH] send-email: quiet some warnings, reject invalid addresses Eric Wong
2006-05-15 5:52 ` [PATCH] send-email: allow sendmail binary to be used instead of SMTP Junio C Hamano
2006-05-15 9:27 ` Eric Wong
2006-05-15 9:34 ` Eric Wong
2006-05-15 9:47 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2006-05-15 10:11 ` Eric Wong
2006-05-15 10:37 ` Martin Langhoff
2006-05-15 16:25 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-05-15 19:10 ` Eric Wong
2006-05-15 21:01 ` Ryan Anderson
2006-05-15 21:13 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-05-15 21:52 ` Ryan Anderson
2006-05-15 22:07 ` Martin Langhoff
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7vmzdjtya4.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net \
--to=junkio@cox.net \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=normalperson@yhbt.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).