From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Subject: Re: The git newbie experience
Date: Sun, 14 May 2006 14:26:21 -0700
Message-ID: <7vmzdk2t8i.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
References: <446778B8.7080201@inoi.fi>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun May 14 23:26:41 2006
Return-path: <git-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org
Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FfO6k-0007J6-Jv
	for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sun, 14 May 2006 23:26:35 +0200
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1750935AbWENV0X (ORCPT <rfc822;gcvg-git@m.gmane.org>);
	Sun, 14 May 2006 17:26:23 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751404AbWENV0X
	(ORCPT <rfc822;git-outgoing>); Sun, 14 May 2006 17:26:23 -0400
Received: from fed1rmmtao12.cox.net ([68.230.241.27]:49386 "EHLO
	fed1rmmtao12.cox.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1750935AbWENV0X (ORCPT <rfc822;git@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sun, 14 May 2006 17:26:23 -0400
Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.4.9.127])
          by fed1rmmtao12.cox.net
          (InterMail vM.6.01.06.01 201-2131-130-101-20060113) with ESMTP
          id <20060514212622.TGMR27919.fed1rmmtao12.cox.net@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>;
          Sun, 14 May 2006 17:26:22 -0400
To: Tommi Virtanen <tv@inoi.fi>
In-Reply-To: <446778B8.7080201@inoi.fi> (Tommi Virtanen's message of "Sun, 14
	May 2006 21:36:40 +0300")
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux)
Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk
X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/19984>

Tommi Virtanen <tv@inoi.fi> writes:

> (21:08:34) ***gitster personally considers getting more users a very
> high priority but agrees that from usability point of view, having a
> mode to expose "stripped down" set of features for simple needs would be
> beneficial.
>
> That I can 100% agree with.

Sorry, I personally consider it is not a very high priority; the
above is a typo (otherwise "but agrees" does not make _any_
sense).

The rest of the message I'll find a time to comment on
separately, but I am in the middle of migrating the development
environment, so it might take some time.

Oh, and please send patches cc'ed to the list at least for a few
days, because I am fighting with fetchmail/getmail configuration
right now and might lose a few mails while doing so.