From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: Parallel pull for ssh-pull Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2005 13:38:33 -0700 Message-ID: <7vmzo09ira.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Aug 02 22:39:21 2005 Return-path: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([12.107.209.244]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1E03XA-0003TZ-60 for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Tue, 02 Aug 2005 22:38:44 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261677AbVHBUij (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Aug 2005 16:38:39 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261771AbVHBUij (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Aug 2005 16:38:39 -0400 Received: from fed1rmmtao02.cox.net ([68.230.241.37]:9453 "EHLO fed1rmmtao02.cox.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261763AbVHBUih (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Aug 2005 16:38:37 -0400 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.4.9.127]) by fed1rmmtao02.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.00 201-2131-118-20041027) with ESMTP id <20050802203835.JOYC3209.fed1rmmtao02.cox.net@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>; Tue, 2 Aug 2005 16:38:35 -0400 To: barkalow@iabervon.org In-Reply-To: (barkalow@iabervon.org's message of "Tue, 2 Aug 2005 16:02:59 -0400 (EDT)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org barkalow@iabervon.org writes: > This work is based on some now in -pu; what should I base my patches on? I > would ideally like to add a function to one of the patches in -pu and fix > a subtle bug in the other, in addition to further patches to actually use > the feature in ssh-pull. The proposed patch queue is just a throw-away branch that I use for the purpose of (1) not to lose patches from people, (2) to ack patches from others, and (3) let people know which ones are under consideration. Either a patch on top of the pu branch, or a brand new patch on top of the master branch would work fine for me. If you feel some stuff that are in pu need to be fixed or cleaned up, you may want choose the latter --- that way, software archaeologists do not need to know that you made a mess in earlier rounds ;-). If you choose to do so, I would appreciate a warning to tell me which existing patches to drop from pu, although that would probably be pretty clear from the context. Thanks.