From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Implement git-vcs-p4 Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2009 10:41:38 -0700 Message-ID: <7vocqu9mzx.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Johan Herland , Pete Wyckoff To: Daniel Barkalow X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Aug 05 19:41:57 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MYkUt-00021Z-Dt for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Wed, 05 Aug 2009 19:41:55 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751234AbZHERls (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Aug 2009 13:41:48 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750918AbZHERls (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Aug 2009 13:41:48 -0400 Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([64.74.157.62]:52393 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750771AbZHERls (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Aug 2009 13:41:48 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AE631EA95; Wed, 5 Aug 2009 13:41:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [68.225.240.211]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 97D3D1EA8C; Wed, 5 Aug 2009 13:41:40 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Daniel Barkalow's message of "Wed\, 5 Aug 2009 01\:02\:31 -0400 \(EDT\)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 3F989CA6-81E7-11DE-A01F-AEF1826986A2-77302942!a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Daniel Barkalow writes: > This is probably not particularly appropriate for mainline > application, and is somewhat buggy, not extensively tested, and > incomplete, but is here as an example implementation of the API and in > case it is useful to other people. I do not mind carrying this in the tree, at least on 'pu', for wider exposure---giving easier access to others _might_ help you gain contributors. But we need to disable this in the Makefile by default and force interested parties to explicitly ask for it if we were to do that.