From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] Implement unstage and reset modes for git-add--interactive Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 09:39:39 -0700 Message-ID: <7vocrakpbo.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <200907231041.32567.trast@student.ethz.ch> <2d756f643fc7d1b50cf590c95467fa029b49ff46.1248426652.git.trast@student.ethz.ch> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Junio C Hamano , Pierre Habouzit To: Thomas Rast X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Jul 24 18:39:56 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MUNoI-0003FZ-2n for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 18:39:54 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752451AbZGXQjs (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Jul 2009 12:39:48 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752200AbZGXQjs (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Jul 2009 12:39:48 -0400 Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([64.74.157.62]:49440 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751362AbZGXQjs (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Jul 2009 12:39:48 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5D0E100DC; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 12:39:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [68.225.240.211]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3BC9A100D9; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 12:39:40 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <2d756f643fc7d1b50cf590c95467fa029b49ff46.1248426652.git.trast@student.ethz.ch> (Thomas Rast's message of "Fri\, 24 Jul 2009 11\:15\:51 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 99171206-7870-11DE-96CF-AEF1826986A2-77302942!a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Thomas Rast writes: > I'm not completely happy with the idea of reset --interactive by the > way, as it's not a reset in the 'reset $commit' sense. Why not? "resetting index entries selectively" makes perfect sense. So do "checking out index entries selectively" and "adding to index selectively".