From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] Draft of API for git-vcs-*, transport.c code to use it. Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 10:42:58 -0700 Message-ID: <7vocvp7b31.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <7vskl284bt.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Daniel Barkalow X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Mar 25 18:44:45 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LmX9f-0002iX-Bv for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Wed, 25 Mar 2009 18:44:43 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1764010AbZCYRnI (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Mar 2009 13:43:08 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1763994AbZCYRnH (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Mar 2009 13:43:07 -0400 Received: from a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([207.106.133.19]:34831 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1763935AbZCYRnG (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Mar 2009 13:43:06 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5616A599E; Wed, 25 Mar 2009 13:43:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [68.225.240.211]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AF606A599D; Wed, 25 Mar 2009 13:43:00 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Daniel Barkalow's message of "Wed, 25 Mar 2009 12:20:13 -0400 (EDT)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 64385FCE-1964-11DE-ACFD-32B0EBB1AA3C-77302942!a-sasl-fastnet.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Daniel Barkalow writes: >> > +'import':: >> > + Takes the remote name and a list of names of refs, and imports >> > + whatever it describes, by outputting it in git-fast-import >> > + format. >> > + >> > +'export':: >> > + Sends the branch to the foreign system and reimports it in >> > + fast-import format. >> >> The above two description is inconsistent; say "git-fast-import" for both. > > Not "fast-import" for both, now that other systems have adopted the format > as input? I did not mean anything deeper than just pointing out that one sentence calls the format "git-fast-import format" and the other one calls "fast-import format".