Re: [PATCH] Add a documentat on how to revert a faulty merge

[Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>]

"Boyd Stephen Smith Jr." <bss@iguanasuicide.net> writes:

> On Saturday 2008 December 20 05:27:02 Nanako Shiraishi wrote:
>> +Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 00:45:19 -0800
>> +From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>, Junio C Hamano
>> <gitster@pobox.com> +Subject: Re: Odd merge behaviour involving reverts
>> +Abstract: Sometimes a branch that was already merged to the mainline
>> + is later found to be faulty.  Linus and Junio give guidance on
>> + recovering from such a premature merge and continuing development
>> + after the offending branch is fixed.
>> +Message-ID: <7vocz8a6zk.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>
>> +References: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0812181949450.14014@localhost.localdomain>
>> +
>> +Alan <alan@clueserver.org> said:
>
> I don't like the email headers as part of the documentation.  It would be 
> better to have a title and abstract in prose.

The above follows the style of other files in Documentation/howto; if you
look at the build procedure of howto-index, you will notice that some of
these are required part of the documentation.

> Also, your email gave me some errors from 'git am':
> .dotest/patch:40: indent with spaces.
>                /

That is "C program source" rules in action.

I thought we had .gitattributes set up in Documentation/ area that applies
different rules to these?  Maybe they have not been tested with things in
howto.