From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: merging .gitignore Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2007 12:55:41 -0700 Message-ID: <7vodfhjnpe.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <20071001130314.GA5932@lapse.madduck.net> <20071001130314.GA5932@lapse.madduck.net> <200710011448.17701.andyparkins@gmail.com> <20071002195148.GA14171@lapse.madduck.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Andy Parkins , Johannes Schindelin To: martin f krafft X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Oct 02 21:55:58 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IcnqX-0003kO-OR for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Tue, 02 Oct 2007 21:55:58 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753271AbXJBTzt (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Oct 2007 15:55:49 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752877AbXJBTzt (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Oct 2007 15:55:49 -0400 Received: from rune.pobox.com ([208.210.124.79]:54785 "EHLO rune.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752588AbXJBTzs (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Oct 2007 15:55:48 -0400 Received: from rune (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rune.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64CBF140639; Tue, 2 Oct 2007 15:56:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (ip68-225-240-77.oc.oc.cox.net [68.225.240.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by rune.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4CCE14044E; Tue, 2 Oct 2007 15:56:05 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <20071002195148.GA14171@lapse.madduck.net> (martin f. krafft's message of "Tue, 2 Oct 2007 20:51:48 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: martin f krafft writes: > Basically I am saying that it should be > > cat $gitignore_files | sort -u > > and obviously, this is something for a specific merge driver, as > Johannes suggested. Perhaps you can use the existing union merge there.