From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: git-send-email and pine alias format Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 23:53:20 -0700 Message-ID: <7vodi2i97j.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Kumar Gala X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Jul 24 08:53:25 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IDEGr-0001rd-7y for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Tue, 24 Jul 2007 08:53:25 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752642AbXGXGxW (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Jul 2007 02:53:22 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752190AbXGXGxW (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Jul 2007 02:53:22 -0400 Received: from fed1rmmtao102.cox.net ([68.230.241.44]:56546 "EHLO fed1rmmtao102.cox.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751146AbXGXGxV (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Jul 2007 02:53:21 -0400 Received: from fed1rmimpo02.cox.net ([70.169.32.72]) by fed1rmmtao102.cox.net (InterMail vM.7.08.02.01 201-2186-121-102-20070209) with ESMTP id <20070724065319.PITS1428.fed1rmmtao102.cox.net@fed1rmimpo02.cox.net>; Tue, 24 Jul 2007 02:53:19 -0400 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.5.247.80]) by fed1rmimpo02.cox.net with bizsmtp id TJtL1X00U1kojtg0000000; Tue, 24 Jul 2007 02:53:21 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Kumar Gala's message of "Mon, 23 Jul 2007 11:49:29 -0500 (CDT)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Kumar Gala writes: > I was wondering why we don't parse the pine alias format according to the > following spec: > > http://www.washington.edu/pine/tech-notes/low-level.html > > I'd expect something like, to get the address field. My guess is simply because we got a "works-for-us" regexp by observing the program's behaviour, done by real Pine users. On top of that, probably nobody knew and/or bothered to check if there is such "official spec" available. Could you send a signed and testable patch to the list so other Pine users can try it out please? After seeing a few Ack's on the list, I'd like to apply it and preferably do so before 1.5.3 final.