From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: most commonly used git commands? Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 00:48:01 -0700 Message-ID: <7vodj41nm6.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.pobox.com> References: <20070625064017.GA2839@mellanox.co.il> <7vlke833wr.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.pobox.com> <20070625071752.GB15343@mellanox.co.il> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Jun 25 09:48:08 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1I2jIu-0004YD-5X for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Mon, 25 Jun 2007 09:48:08 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750950AbXFYHsG (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Jun 2007 03:48:06 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750831AbXFYHsF (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Jun 2007 03:48:05 -0400 Received: from fed1rmmtao104.cox.net ([68.230.241.42]:34156 "EHLO fed1rmmtao104.cox.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750781AbXFYHsE (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Jun 2007 03:48:04 -0400 Received: from fed1rmimpo01.cox.net ([70.169.32.71]) by fed1rmmtao104.cox.net (InterMail vM.7.08.02.01 201-2186-121-102-20070209) with ESMTP id <20070625074801.WVNA17635.fed1rmmtao104.cox.net@fed1rmimpo01.cox.net>; Mon, 25 Jun 2007 03:48:01 -0400 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.pobox.com ([68.5.247.80]) by fed1rmimpo01.cox.net with bizsmtp id Fjo11X0051kojtg0000000; Mon, 25 Jun 2007 03:48:02 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20070625071752.GB15343@mellanox.co.il> (Michael S. Tsirkin's message of "Mon, 25 Jun 2007 10:17:52 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: "Michael S. Tsirkin" writes: >> Quoting Junio C Hamano : >> Perhaps they are most commonly used by the person who came up >> with that list first ;-)? >> >> I think "add" deserves to be there, I am not sure "apply" is. > > git add is supposed to be rare, no? > That's why git commit lists file additions/removals ... No. You are talking in terms of pre-1.5 git. The semantics of "git add" has been clarified since then --- it adds contents, and is not about telling git that there are new files it did not know so far.