From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [RFC] git-remote Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2007 19:07:38 -0800 Message-ID: <7vodpejhmt.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <7vfyarokk7.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <20070105030245.GC14042@spearce.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Jan 05 04:07:48 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1H2fQk-00089a-LN for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Fri, 05 Jan 2007 04:07:43 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030276AbXAEDHk (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Jan 2007 22:07:40 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030302AbXAEDHk (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Jan 2007 22:07:40 -0500 Received: from fed1rmmtao09.cox.net ([68.230.241.30]:52777 "EHLO fed1rmmtao09.cox.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030276AbXAEDHj (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Jan 2007 22:07:39 -0500 Received: from fed1rmimpo02.cox.net ([70.169.32.72]) by fed1rmmtao09.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.06.03 201-2131-130-104-20060516) with ESMTP id <20070105030739.QOJR18767.fed1rmmtao09.cox.net@fed1rmimpo02.cox.net>; Thu, 4 Jan 2007 22:07:39 -0500 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.5.247.80]) by fed1rmimpo02.cox.net with bizsmtp id 7F7t1W00Z1kojtg0000000; Thu, 04 Jan 2007 22:07:54 -0500 To: "Shawn O. Pearce" In-Reply-To: <20070105030245.GC14042@spearce.org> (Shawn O. Pearce's message of "Thu, 4 Jan 2007 22:02:45 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: "Shawn O. Pearce" writes: > Junio C Hamano wrote: >> It might be handy to have a single command that helps you manage >> your configuration that relates to downloading from remote >> repositories. This currently does only about 20% of what I want >> it to do. >> >> $ git remote > > This is pretty cool. It would be nice if something like it was > in 1.5.0. ;-) Hmph. By the way, do you have comments on my counterproposal for lockfile fix?