From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Add read_cache_from() and discard_cache() Date: Tue, 04 Jul 2006 10:41:58 -0700 Message-ID: <7vodw5gtcp.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <20060630002756.GD22618@steel.home> <7v3bdmk2zj.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <7v64ihdupr.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <7virmepfhx.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Jul 04 19:42:34 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FxouY-0004Sj-FP for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Tue, 04 Jul 2006 19:42:11 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932243AbWGDRmA (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Jul 2006 13:42:00 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932250AbWGDRmA (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Jul 2006 13:42:00 -0400 Received: from fed1rmmtao11.cox.net ([68.230.241.28]:4739 "EHLO fed1rmmtao11.cox.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932243AbWGDRl7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Jul 2006 13:41:59 -0400 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.4.9.127]) by fed1rmmtao11.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.06.01 201-2131-130-101-20060113) with ESMTP id <20060704174158.LEAG554.fed1rmmtao11.cox.net@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>; Tue, 4 Jul 2006 13:41:58 -0400 To: Johannes Schindelin In-Reply-To: (Johannes Schindelin's message of "Tue, 4 Jul 2006 16:18:49 +0200 (CEST)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Johannes Schindelin writes: > Ummm. After reading my original mail again: bad tobacco that was. Of > course, I meant discard_cache(), not get_merge_bases(). Setting > index_file_timestamp in get_merge_bases() would be wrong. I was well aware you were talking about discard_cache(). I think these two clean-ups are good to have there.