From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH 0/5] Implement 'prior' commit object links (and other commit links ideas) Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 12:51:08 -0700 Message-ID: <7vodypv3gz.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <20060425035421.18382.51677.stgit@localhost.localdomain> <7v7j5e2jv7.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <7vslo1v4zw.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Apr 25 21:51:24 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FYTZ9-0002B5-SK for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Tue, 25 Apr 2006 21:51:20 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932175AbWDYTvL (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Apr 2006 15:51:11 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932225AbWDYTvL (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Apr 2006 15:51:11 -0400 Received: from fed1rmmtao06.cox.net ([68.230.241.33]:905 "EHLO fed1rmmtao06.cox.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932175AbWDYTvJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Apr 2006 15:51:09 -0400 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.4.9.127]) by fed1rmmtao06.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.06.01 201-2131-130-101-20060113) with ESMTP id <20060425195109.BNWG21197.fed1rmmtao06.cox.net@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>; Tue, 25 Apr 2006 15:51:09 -0400 To: Linus Torvalds In-Reply-To: (Linus Torvalds's message of "Tue, 25 Apr 2006 12:34:25 -0700 (PDT)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Linus Torvalds writes: > On Tue, 25 Apr 2006, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> >> Then we should drop the author header and make it part of free >> form text. The core does not give any meaning to it. > > Sure it does. It's an integral part of logging: we not only verify the > format, we also have multiple different ways of showing it. So it > definitely changes the way we "act", very fundamentally. Unfair ;-). I'd consider "git log" semi-Porcelain and consider rev-list and cat-file the true core level. But you already made it clear that you are not opposed to 'note' with a clear semantics "we _ignore_ it", the point was moot. Sorry for the noise.