From: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] Invalidate cache-tree entries for touched paths in git-apply.
Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 18:25:58 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7vodyrdas9.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7v3bg3etnv.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> (Junio C. Hamano's message of "Sun, 23 Apr 2006 16:52:52 -0700")
Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> writes:
> * ... then the big rock falls. With this, I tried to apply and
> then write-tree "diff-tree -p $commit^1 $commit" on top of
> "$commit^1" for the last 20 or so commits in the kernel tree.
> The "master" version takes 0.15 second per patch on my Duron
> 750 with 700MB, while this one does that in 0.06 second.
> This also helps the memory pressure because we do not have to
> regenerate unchanged trees. 810 minor faults with the patch
> vs 2150 minor faults without.
Sorry, but not really. The patch is wrong and the measurement
was flawed.
It was doing unnecessarily more work in git-apply, which made
git-write-tree a no-op, and I was measuring only git-write-tree.
The following goes on top of the series to remove that
unnecessary work from git-apply. Unfortunately this makes the
overall combination a bit slower than before X-<.
But I have not optimized cache-tree.c for speed; for example,
its subtree lists are not even sorted. Once that is done we may
get decent speedups from the combo.
---
diff --git a/apply.c b/apply.c
index 5fa2c1e..e283df3 100644
--- a/apply.c
+++ b/apply.c
@@ -1935,8 +1935,6 @@ static int apply_patch(int fd, const cha
active_cache_sha1) ||
commit_index_file(&cache_file))
die("Unable to write new cachefile");
- cache_tree_update(active_cache_tree,
- active_cache, active_nr, 1);
write_cache_tree(active_cache_sha1, active_cache_tree);
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-04-24 1:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-04-23 23:52 [PATCH 4/4] Invalidate cache-tree entries for touched paths in git-apply Junio C Hamano
2006-04-24 1:25 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2006-04-24 2:47 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-04-24 3:03 ` [PATCH 5/4] Minimum fixups to cache-tree Junio C Hamano
2006-04-24 5:41 ` 50% speed-up of "git-apply && git-write-tree" sequence Junio C Hamano
2006-04-24 21:31 ` maintenance of cache-tree data Junio C Hamano
2006-04-24 22:34 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-04-25 23:05 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7vodyrdas9.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net \
--to=junkio@cox.net \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).