From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: Remove unneeded packs Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2005 18:38:17 -0800 Message-ID: <7voe4pclwm.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <1131800663.29461.11.camel@blade> <4375EA80.7070405@op5.se> <1131802238.29461.18.camel@blade> <43766687.2000007@etek.chalmers.se> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-2022-jp-2 Cc: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun Nov 13 03:38:46 2005 Return-path: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Eb7l8-00089k-Sn for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sun, 13 Nov 2005 03:38:23 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750942AbVKMCiU (ORCPT ); Sat, 12 Nov 2005 21:38:20 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750946AbVKMCiU (ORCPT ); Sat, 12 Nov 2005 21:38:20 -0500 Received: from fed1rmmtao09.cox.net ([68.230.241.30]:58029 "EHLO fed1rmmtao09.cox.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750861AbVKMCiT (ORCPT ); Sat, 12 Nov 2005 21:38:19 -0500 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.4.9.127]) by fed1rmmtao09.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with ESMTP id <20051113023819.KBBM9260.fed1rmmtao09.cox.net@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>; Sat, 12 Nov 2005 21:38:19 -0500 To: Lukas =?iso-2022-jp-2?B?U2FuZHN0chsuQRtOdm0=?= In-Reply-To: <43766687.2000007@etek.chalmers.se> (Lukas =?iso-2022-jp-2?B?U2FuZHN0chsuQRtOdm0ncw==?= message of "Sat, 12 Nov 2005 23:02:47 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Lukas Sandstr.ANvm writes: > This is most likley because the pack b3c6... contains unreachable objects. > git-pack-redundant only makes sure that all objects present in packfiles > still are present in packfiles after the redundant packs have been removed. > ... > I'm thinking of the possibility passing a list of objects to be ignored > on stdin to git-pack-redundant. This would hopefully solve this problem. But once you go down that path, wouldn't doing 'repack -a -d' become looking simpler and more attractive, I wonder?