From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH] Change 'cache' to 'index' in the docs Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 17:34:41 -0800 Message-ID: <7voe4svufi.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <4373EFFB.6060802@etek.chalmers.se> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-2022-jp-2 Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, junkio@cox.net X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Nov 11 02:35:35 2005 Return-path: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EaNoa-0002vP-BL for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Fri, 11 Nov 2005 02:34:52 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932335AbVKKBen (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Nov 2005 20:34:43 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932333AbVKKBen (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Nov 2005 20:34:43 -0500 Received: from fed1rmmtao02.cox.net ([68.230.241.37]:40674 "EHLO fed1rmmtao02.cox.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932325AbVKKBen (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Nov 2005 20:34:43 -0500 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.4.9.127]) by fed1rmmtao02.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with ESMTP id <20051111013355.FWVY29216.fed1rmmtao02.cox.net@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 20:33:55 -0500 To: Lukas =?iso-2022-jp-2?B?U2FuZHN0chsuQRtOdm0=?= In-Reply-To: <4373EFFB.6060802@etek.chalmers.se> (Lukas =?iso-2022-jp-2?B?U2FuZHN0chsuQRtOdm0ncw==?= message of "Fri, 11 Nov 2005 02:12:27 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Lukas Sandstr.ANvm writes: > git-update-index.txt says: > "Modifies the index or directory cache." > > I thought the index was the directory cache. > Is git-update-index.txt badly worded or is there something > I'm missing? Nothing. Just 'cache' is so ingrained to the brain of some/many of us that we let it go unnoticed, with an excuse that somewhere we say "index aka cache".