From: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: clarifying two tree merge semantics
Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2005 12:59:58 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7voeajp875.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0506061210490.1876@ppc970.osdl.org> (Linus Torvalds's message of "Mon, 6 Jun 2005 12:15:38 -0700 (PDT)")
By the way, there is one case that you need to keep an eye on if
you are making further fixes to "git-read-tree -m $H $M",
especially now we are talking about keeping what we slurp from
stage0 sometimes:
(1) index has DF (file)
(2) $H has DF (file); the index matches it.
(3) $M has DF/DF (file), implicitly making DF a directory.
For path DF, this rule from the earlier matrix applies:
exists exists (index=$H) no such path *2*
* path is removed.
For path DF/DF, this rule from the earlier matrix applies:
no such path no such path exists
* take $M without complaining.
Thanks to *2*, the current code gets it right and we do not end
up with a cache that records both DF and DF/DF at the same time.
I cannot tell if it is by design or by accident :-).
There is a safety valve at the end of write-tree to refuse to
write out such a nonsensical tree but as Pasky argued back then
(a similar problem was discussed and resolved when you were
away, around the beginning of May, involving update-cache), when
that safety valuve was added, the damage has already been done
if we allow such a cache entry to be created in the first place.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-06-06 19:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-06-06 8:43 new read-tree questions Junio C Hamano
2005-06-06 15:04 ` Linus Torvalds
[not found] ` <7vbr6jtiqi.fsf_-_@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.58.0506061210490.1876@ppc970.osdl.org>
2005-06-06 19:59 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7voeajp875.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net \
--to=junkio@cox.net \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox