From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Move sequencer to builtin Date: Sun, 09 Jun 2013 14:39:55 -0700 Message-ID: <7vppvvnetw.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <20130608164902.GA3109@elie.Belkin> <20130608173447.GA4381@elie.Belkin> <20130609014049.GA10375@google.com> <20130609052624.GB561@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20130609180437.GB810@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20130609184553.GG810@sigill.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Ramkumar Ramachandra , Felipe Contreras , Jonathan Nieder , Duy Nguyen , Git Mailing List , Brandon Casey To: Jeff King X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun Jun 09 23:40:03 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UlnLG-0006xL-Da for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Sun, 09 Jun 2013 23:40:02 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751494Ab3FIVj6 (ORCPT ); Sun, 9 Jun 2013 17:39:58 -0400 Received: from b-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com ([208.72.237.35]:34062 "EHLO smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751485Ab3FIVj5 (ORCPT ); Sun, 9 Jun 2013 17:39:57 -0400 Received: from smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by b-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33AA12640D; Sun, 9 Jun 2013 21:39:57 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=q0PJq3nbFFDkQZS5yHHu5KCFR6E=; b=pHBunF MCaao11KzrYpjDM9SavOaxeIgToYYIykdRwbor5ecAaTe4DEvfE43B/Nzk3b6SG4 fCIaxZaYczIexebkPTVyOjzxPDamMDna23jOJy2wAgC103tUyyBXWzQERqFk7Os/ s/9PGlP/NtmoeunygEaeT/kOjPDyjaRJ04DTU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=MDfeeYZTjQuevKKplIN2Sx493E7e5ALQ 2/hNkkAvCupDpfhy4jLRWtZFXEJVEBlg4ZM5NPCTaOkpuSohDvCR4Uz+hv0v2558 mCUBY6qKLfMahZKOLbXTaKOjUrxbmctu4RBm4jYcdFfut8fVAgSUXNQEXszglT4b KvHgBxio3U0= Received: from b-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by b-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26AF52640C; Sun, 9 Jun 2013 21:39:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [50.161.4.97]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by b-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 87F9226408; Sun, 9 Jun 2013 21:39:56 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <20130609184553.GG810@sigill.intra.peff.net> (Jeff King's message of "Sun, 9 Jun 2013 14:45:54 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 20BD093E-D14D-11E2-BEDE-E56BAAC0D69C-77302942!b-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Jeff King writes: > ... We do not have an explicit code of > conduct on the list, but it is not as if behavior is without > consequences. If you are not easy to work with, people will get tired of > dealing with you eventually[1]. FWIW, I have already reached that point and learned to kill certain types of threads in my MUA. There is no point wasting time arguing, rather than tending to patches from other people. One example of killing the entire thread is when I see "This patch will not be applied" by Felipe in a thread started with his patch. I understand that it is his way to say "this patch is retracted" without having to explicitly say that he now understands that reviews showed why the patch was wrong or that he thanks the reviewer for enlightening him. The patch will come back, with corrections as necessary, if it has merit, so we do not lose anything of value anyway by discarding the thread.