From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Nov 2010, #02; Wed, 17) Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 09:13:10 -0800 Message-ID: <7vpqtutzkp.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <7v1v6je9g8.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <7v1v6icyb0.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <201011200142.26522.jnareb@gmail.com> <4CEC6E2A.9080605@kernel.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Jakub Narebski , git@vger.kernel.org To: "J.H." X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Nov 24 18:13:29 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PLIuM-000855-9W for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 18:13:26 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755904Ab0KXRNV (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Nov 2010 12:13:21 -0500 Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([64.74.157.62]:33629 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755749Ab0KXRNU (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Nov 2010 12:13:20 -0500 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 720D82ECD; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 12:13:33 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=to:cc:subject :references:from:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=3vp6dHKFQMK9/yThOF7Jb7I4kd0=; b=fIgTMP Ebobrj2W3d+aM+5JrEL7wfvVjszoct81ZWETiRwGn1f1E2x7ns5dBXZGen/egyZd cgsASKZa2C1MCo0jvRKZkn2TpTVcsI1KvstCrkyv1Ur7jHaTGeyLHGB6WFUj9ex6 1gtfrvFalVJyyr7vmHADfGjPpwGrQinA/oQ5E= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=to:cc:subject :references:from:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=CavG/PEyfFMke6mecbKIhYNwCCbuLY6Y IG/XG6ecJo4fHvsfzmeB9hsLj0L+RUPmkEWg/k4ps7dek9oiNRJ8vUu1Qw5ynGoZ zoPUm6riJckHCf7YYZ5SDrfaKG+jMN3Kwx5BFwq86mwDyc0T8/wmuLWQZ8f5b/rG LzJONInLceM= Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41AD42ECC; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 12:13:30 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [76.102.170.102]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 393CE2ECB; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 12:13:25 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <4CEC6E2A.9080605@kernel.org> (J. H.'s message of "Tue\, 23 Nov 2010 17\:45\:14 -0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 28BF6702-F7EE-11DF-8734-DF8536391E49-77302942!a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: "J.H." writes: > While I don't disagree, being able to support other caching systems > would be nice, we have this now, it's tested and it works. I'd argue > this is a step 1, step 2 case at this point. I would have to agree; getting some cache layer that is known to work (you are battle testing your updates on a busy site of yours as you develop, right?) early, quick and dirty with minimum changes, is more beneficial than waiting for a large rewrite thats "gets it perfect this time". > I'm currently working from on top of Jakub's last tree, though I've got > some questions about his reasoning on a few things now that I've been > digging into it. Thanks both for keeping the ball rolling.