From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] send-email: --suppress-cc improvements Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 02:47:16 -0800 Message-ID: <7vprhkm0y3.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <7vzlgpzfru.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <1234631186-10179-1-git-send-email-trast@student.ethz.ch> <200902142321.22904.trast@student.ethz.ch> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Jay Soffian , git@vger.kernel.org To: Thomas Rast X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun Feb 15 11:48:51 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LYeYN-0007vE-0c for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Sun, 15 Feb 2009 11:48:51 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752176AbZBOKrY (ORCPT ); Sun, 15 Feb 2009 05:47:24 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752027AbZBOKrX (ORCPT ); Sun, 15 Feb 2009 05:47:23 -0500 Received: from a-sasl-quonix.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([208.72.237.25]:56424 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751988AbZBOKrX (ORCPT ); Sun, 15 Feb 2009 05:47:23 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by b-sasl-quonix.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34BC22B2C8; Sun, 15 Feb 2009 05:47:22 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [68.225.240.211]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by b-sasl-quonix.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7B24E2B2C2; Sun, 15 Feb 2009 05:47:18 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <200902142321.22904.trast@student.ethz.ch> (Thomas Rast's message of "Sat, 14 Feb 2009 23:21:11 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 06421D3A-FB4E-11DD-BA22-6F7C8D1D4FD0-77302942!a-sasl-quonix.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Thomas Rast writes: > I just noticed that I lost the comments after '---' due to repeated > format-patch'ing, so here goes: Thanks; Jay did another round of updates based on this one, which I think is the one I took, if I did things correctly ;-)