From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Cc: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>,
David Symonds <dsymonds@gmail.com>,
git@vger.kernel.org, gitster@pobox.com,
Stephan Beyer <s-beyer@gmx.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] git-diff: Add --staged as a synonym for --cached.
Date: Sun, 02 Nov 2008 01:30:46 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7vprle1qdl.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081029171122.GA12167@sigill.intra.peff.net> (Jeff King's message of "Wed, 29 Oct 2008 13:11:22 -0400")
Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
> If we assume that we have only the word "stage" and variations
> available, then there aren't too many options.
>
> only the staging area:
> --stage-only, --staged-only
>
> both:
> --staged (as opposed to --staged-only) --stage-and-worktree (too
> long), --both (not descriptive enough), --stage-too (yuck)
A flag "--staged" that means "staged changes and changes in the work tree"
is no worse than the current "--index". If we were to shoot for clarity,
how about --staged-only (aka --cached) vs --staged-and-unstaged (aka --index)?
I am actually actively unhappy about the latter, but I like more
descriptive --staged-only for the former a lot better.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-02 8:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-29 16:15 [PATCH] git-diff: Add --staged as a synonym for --cached David Symonds
2008-10-29 16:42 ` Jeff King
2008-10-29 16:50 ` David Symonds
2008-10-29 17:06 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-10-29 17:11 ` Jeff King
2008-11-02 8:30 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2008-11-03 7:04 ` Jeff King
2008-11-02 12:35 ` Björn Steinbrink
2008-11-02 18:30 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-11-02 18:54 ` Björn Steinbrink
2008-11-03 7:14 ` Jeff King
2008-11-10 23:37 ` David Symonds
2008-11-11 0:15 ` Jeff King
2008-11-11 1:11 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-11-11 1:22 ` Jeff King
2008-11-12 0:57 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-11-11 4:04 ` Avery Pennarun
2008-11-11 5:49 ` Miles Bader
2008-11-12 8:33 ` Jeff King
2008-11-12 11:10 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-11-12 11:06 ` Jeff King
2008-11-12 15:39 ` Avery Pennarun
2008-11-12 19:15 ` Jeff King
2008-11-12 19:29 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-11-12 19:37 ` Jeff King
2008-11-12 19:57 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-11-12 22:39 ` Avery Pennarun
2008-11-12 23:42 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-11-12 15:46 ` Avery Pennarun
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7vprle1qdl.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=dsymonds@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
--cc=s-beyer@gmx.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).