From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Robert Schiele <rschiele@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] add definitions for global variables to shell.c
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 00:53:21 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7vpro5fnke.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080819072650.GE11842@schiele.dyndns.org> (Robert Schiele's message of "Tue, 19 Aug 2008 09:26:51 +0200")
Robert Schiele <rschiele@gmail.com> writes:
> On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 05:29:11PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> Haven't looked at the real declarations but if the decl are "extern" and
>> nobody refers to them, why should the resulting object file require them
>> to be defined anywhere? If the decl are not and in (fortran-ish) "common"
>> section, on the other hand, you shouldn't have to define them yourself
>> like this either.
>>
>> This sounds like a compiler bug to me.
>
> This was my first thought as well but after more inspection there are two
> things to consider:
>
> 1. I was not really precise enough in my description since I didn't spot that
> when I looked into the issue first: Actually there are references to these
> variables in static inline functions in cache.h. Thus there actually is a
> reference though one that will never be used since abspath.c (that includes
> cache.h) is not calling any of these functions.
>
> 2. Since these symbols turn out to be referenced though in dead code only I
> wouldn't call it a compiler bug.
Ok, as I said, I didn't look. If they are indeed referenced, that is a
different story.
Even if that is the case, I do not like the prospect of having to maintain
a set of duplicated variable definitions. If we really wanted to address
this issue, maybe we would want a separate source file that is linked to
both git-shell and to the rest of the system that has nothing but
definitions of these variables? I thought environment.c was meant to be
something like that -- would linking environment.o pull in too many extra
references these days (again, I didn't try)?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-19 7:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-18 12:37 [PATCH] add definitions for global variables to shell.c Robert Schiele
2008-08-19 0:29 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-08-19 7:26 ` Robert Schiele
2008-08-19 7:53 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2008-08-19 8:16 ` Robert Schiele
2008-08-19 8:49 ` Johannes Sixt
2008-08-19 9:18 ` Robert Schiele
2008-08-19 23:09 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-08-20 1:06 ` [PATCH 1/2] shell: do not play duplicated definition games to shrink the executable Junio C Hamano
2008-08-20 1:06 ` [PATCH 2/2] Build-in "git-shell" Junio C Hamano
2008-08-20 6:54 ` Johannes Sixt
2008-08-20 1:06 ` [PATCH] add definitions for global variables to shell.c Junio C Hamano
2008-08-20 4:36 ` Robert Schiele
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7vpro5fnke.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rschiele@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).