From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: theirs/ours was Re: [PATCH 6/6] Add a new test for using a custom merge strategy Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 13:07:33 -0700 Message-ID: <7vproxrcvu.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <20080728185604.GA26322@sigill.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Jeff King , sverre@rabbelier.nl, Git Mailinglist , Miklos Vajna To: Johannes Schindelin X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Jul 28 22:08:46 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KNZ1P-0006oa-5e for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 22:08:43 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752538AbYG1UHn (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jul 2008 16:07:43 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752217AbYG1UHn (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jul 2008 16:07:43 -0400 Received: from a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([207.106.133.19]:33531 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752169AbYG1UHm (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jul 2008 16:07:42 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F8C3482A5; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 16:07:41 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (ip68-225-240-211.oc.oc.cox.net [68.225.240.211]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A1B9A482A4; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 16:07:35 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Johannes Schindelin's message of "Mon, 28 Jul 2008 20:09:55 +0100 (BST)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: D5682346-5CE0-11DD-8913-CE28B26B55AE-77302942!a-sasl-fastnet.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Johannes Schindelin writes: > Well, I have to say that the workflow is a bit backwards if the person who > _publishes_ the thing is the one saying "Ooops, my version no goodie, > other version please, but so that pull still works". > > I would have expected the one who has the good version to make the choice. That reminds me of: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/89178 to one of whose messages I sent a response today.