From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [BUG REPORT] "git ls-remote http://git.domain.com/repo.git HEAD" doesn't work Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2008 00:24:36 -0700 Message-ID: <7vprqkh423.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <20080614071011.GA29699@glandium.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Sven , git@vger.kernel.org To: Mike Hommey X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Jun 14 09:25:50 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1K7Q8x-0007U8-Ds for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Sat, 14 Jun 2008 09:25:47 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752681AbYFNHYy (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 Jun 2008 03:24:54 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752645AbYFNHYy (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 Jun 2008 03:24:54 -0400 Received: from a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([207.106.133.19]:37296 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752560AbYFNHYx (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 Jun 2008 03:24:53 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A94032243; Sat, 14 Jun 2008 03:24:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (ip68-225-240-77.oc.oc.cox.net [68.225.240.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0DB342242; Sat, 14 Jun 2008 03:24:44 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <20080614071011.GA29699@glandium.org> (Mike Hommey's message of "Sat, 14 Jun 2008 09:10:11 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: F9C4C86E-39E2-11DD-89E2-F9737025C2AA-77302942!a-sasl-fastnet.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Mike Hommey writes: > http://www.kernel.org/pub/scm/git/git.git/info/refs doesn't contain HEAD. > Shouldn't it ? Traditionally it _never_ talked about HEAD as it technically is not a ref.