From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH] allow git-am to run in a subdirectory Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 23:38:55 -0800 Message-ID: <7vprue6ghc.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <20080301062255.GA27538@coredump.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Jeff King X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Mar 01 08:39:48 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JVMJv-0004s6-GS for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Sat, 01 Mar 2008 08:39:47 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753802AbYCAHjL (ORCPT ); Sat, 1 Mar 2008 02:39:11 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753840AbYCAHjK (ORCPT ); Sat, 1 Mar 2008 02:39:10 -0500 Received: from a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([207.106.133.19]:42496 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753802AbYCAHjJ (ORCPT ); Sat, 1 Mar 2008 02:39:09 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD9382485; Sat, 1 Mar 2008 02:39:07 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (ip68-225-240-77.oc.oc.cox.net [68.225.240.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27FC52484; Sat, 1 Mar 2008 02:39:02 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <20080301062255.GA27538@coredump.intra.peff.net> (Jeff King's message of "Sat, 1 Mar 2008 01:22:55 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Jeff King writes: > I can't imagine anyone would be confused by this behavior. As long as you do not lose sight of the mailbox parameter by chdir'ing around, I am Ok with the patch. ... and after I started writing that, I find... > ... > It will fail to find your mbox file if you specified a relative path > and it had to change directories. I don't know if that case is worth > handling. Hmmm ;-).