From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH] More test cases for sanitized path names Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2008 09:45:31 -0800 Message-ID: <7vprvg8tac.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <47975FE6.4050709@viscovery.net> <200802011010.41938.robin.rosenberg.lists@dewire.com> <7v63x99dt9.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <200802011517.28895.robin.rosenberg.lists@dewire.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Johannes Schindelin , Johannes Sixt , Shawn Bohrer , git@vger.kernel.org To: Robin Rosenberg X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Feb 01 18:46:28 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JKzy5-00080v-LM for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Fri, 01 Feb 2008 18:46:26 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751684AbYBARpv (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Feb 2008 12:45:51 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752005AbYBARpv (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Feb 2008 12:45:51 -0500 Received: from a-sasl-quonix.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([208.72.237.25]:44079 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751565AbYBARpu (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Feb 2008 12:45:50 -0500 Received: from a-sasl-quonix (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4764735E8; Fri, 1 Feb 2008 12:45:45 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (ip68-225-240-77.oc.oc.cox.net [68.225.240.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E07135B3; Fri, 1 Feb 2008 12:45:36 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <200802011517.28895.robin.rosenberg.lists@dewire.com> (Robin Rosenberg's message of "Fri, 1 Feb 2008 15:17:27 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Robin Rosenberg writes: > fredagen den 1 februari 2008 skrev Junio C Hamano: > >> Ah, you found breakages. >> >> I could not quite tell what you meant by these tests with >> test_expect_failure, either they were misuse or "currently fails >> but they shouldn't". Coming up with a small reproducible >> failure case is 50% of solving the problem. That's very >> appreciated. >> ... > I had those test cases on my machine from my earlier work on absolute > path names so I just ran them with your code and extracted those that > failed and put them into your testsuite instead. That's why I sent them > so early... Yeah, I initially did not realize that was what you were doing, hence the above "I could not quite tell, ... but thanks now I got it".