From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: Git and Scmbug integration Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 17:11:31 -0800 Message-ID: <7vprydpr5o.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <1194980792.4106.6.camel@localhost> <1194998142.4106.24.camel@localhost> <1194999404.4106.40.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: "Kristis Makris" , jnareb@gmail.com, git@vger.kernel.org, scmbug-users@lists.mkgnu.net To: "David Symonds" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Nov 14 02:12:18 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Is6ng-0004Pd-Kv for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Wed, 14 Nov 2007 02:12:17 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1761610AbXKNBLw (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Nov 2007 20:11:52 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1761011AbXKNBLw (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Nov 2007 20:11:52 -0500 Received: from sceptre.pobox.com ([207.106.133.20]:39620 "EHLO sceptre.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759186AbXKNBLv (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Nov 2007 20:11:51 -0500 Received: from sceptre (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by sceptre.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFACF2F0; Tue, 13 Nov 2007 20:12:12 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (ip68-225-240-77.oc.oc.cox.net [68.225.240.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by sceptre.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 348DB95737; Tue, 13 Nov 2007 20:12:05 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (David Symonds's message of "Wed, 14 Nov 2007 11:27:40 +1100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: "David Symonds" writes: > Sure -- I've got a patch for it that I'll send shortly. It's using the > existing shell git-commit, so might be suitable for maint; I haven't > followed what's happened with the builtinification of git-commit. No, 'maint' won't get a feature enhancements. Again, why isn't reading HEAD enough?