From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: git-svn: Protect against "diff.color = true". Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 15:14:06 -0700 Message-ID: <7vps13wdw1.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <46aeb24f0708310558t2defc547v483586f116d8b8ac@mail.gmail.com> <7vveav21uv.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <20070831152153.GA30745@muzzle> <7v4pifzawc.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <7v4pifxuia.fsf_-_@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <7vtzqfwf5c.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Eric Wong , Robert Newson , git@vger.kernel.org To: Johannes Schindelin X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Sep 01 00:14:37 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IREl8-0006Br-UD for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sat, 01 Sep 2007 00:14:35 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751008AbXHaWON (ORCPT ); Fri, 31 Aug 2007 18:14:13 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750870AbXHaWOM (ORCPT ); Fri, 31 Aug 2007 18:14:12 -0400 Received: from rune.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([208.210.124.37]:44380 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750840AbXHaWOM (ORCPT ); Fri, 31 Aug 2007 18:14:12 -0400 Received: from pobox.com (ip68-225-240-77.oc.oc.cox.net [68.225.240.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by rune.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B110812C019; Fri, 31 Aug 2007 18:14:29 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Johannes Schindelin's message of "Fri, 31 Aug 2007 22:53:08 +0100 (BST)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Johannes Schindelin writes: > On Fri, 31 Aug 2007, Junio C Hamano wrote: > >> Johannes Schindelin writes: >> ... >> > I just tested on a busybox clone: Works as expected. Without your patch, >> > I get the uninitialised values, with your patch it is fine. >> > >> > ACK. >> >> Thanks. >> >> It's customary that the privilege to issue Ack is reserved to >> the primary owner of the code. We are a relatively small >> friendly community and it is not a big deal, but if you ever >> work on the kernel, be somewhat more careful. People are picky >> over there on such details. > > Happily, we are a much friendlier bunch here ;-) > > Besides, since I feel we're really close to 1.5.3 now, I thought that you > might want to here as many positive votes as you can get. > > But yes, I'll keep that in mind ;-) Oh, I did not mean to sound like your testing does not count. I was just cautioning about using the word "Ack". I will have a "Tested-by: " line with your name on it, and I am hoping I can get an Ack from Eric but it is such an "obviously correct" looking change, so ...