From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH] git-clone: use cpio's --quiet flag Date: Sat, 04 Aug 2007 11:27:04 -0700 Message-ID: <7vps23gnpj.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <20070804070308.GA6493@coredump.intra.peff.net> <20070804160409.GA16326@sigill.intra.peff.net> <7vwswbgphu.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <20070804175240.GB17113@sigill.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Johannes Schindelin , git@vger.kernel.org To: Jeff King X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Aug 04 20:27:18 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IHOLO-0006Pv-7z for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sat, 04 Aug 2007 20:27:18 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1765005AbXHDS1J (ORCPT ); Sat, 4 Aug 2007 14:27:09 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1764996AbXHDS1H (ORCPT ); Sat, 4 Aug 2007 14:27:07 -0400 Received: from fed1rmmtao101.cox.net ([68.230.241.45]:37245 "EHLO fed1rmmtao101.cox.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757661AbXHDS1G (ORCPT ); Sat, 4 Aug 2007 14:27:06 -0400 Received: from fed1rmimpo01.cox.net ([70.169.32.71]) by fed1rmmtao101.cox.net (InterMail vM.7.08.02.01 201-2186-121-102-20070209) with ESMTP id <20070804182706.BMZV2095.fed1rmmtao101.cox.net@fed1rmimpo01.cox.net>; Sat, 4 Aug 2007 14:27:06 -0400 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.5.247.80]) by fed1rmimpo01.cox.net with bizsmtp id XuT51X00C1kojtg0000000; Sat, 04 Aug 2007 14:27:05 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20070804175240.GB17113@sigill.intra.peff.net> (Jeff King's message of "Sat, 4 Aug 2007 13:52:40 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Jeff King writes: > On Sat, Aug 04, 2007 at 10:48:29AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > >> I was hoping that we can say that the output is analogous to the >> native transport reporting "Conting objects: XXXX" and stuff... > > It always says "0 blocks" for me, which looks a bit like an error (but > the clone seems to work fine). Try cloning across filesystem boundaries so that you do not get a hardlink -- you will get block count of the copy ;-)