From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH] git-fsck: add --lost-found option Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2007 17:08:25 -0700 Message-ID: <7vps3auz5y.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <7vabuewgdb.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Johannes Schindelin X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Jul 03 02:08:40 2007 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1I5Vwd-000842-L2 for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Tue, 03 Jul 2007 02:08:39 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755358AbXGCAI2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Jul 2007 20:08:28 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755226AbXGCAI2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Jul 2007 20:08:28 -0400 Received: from fed1rmmtao103.cox.net ([68.230.241.43]:39663 "EHLO fed1rmmtao103.cox.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754838AbXGCAI1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Jul 2007 20:08:27 -0400 Received: from fed1rmimpo01.cox.net ([70.169.32.71]) by fed1rmmtao103.cox.net (InterMail vM.7.08.02.01 201-2186-121-102-20070209) with ESMTP id <20070703000826.VIYK1594.fed1rmmtao103.cox.net@fed1rmimpo01.cox.net>; Mon, 2 Jul 2007 20:08:26 -0400 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.5.247.80]) by fed1rmimpo01.cox.net with bizsmtp id Jo8R1X00l1kojtg0000000; Mon, 02 Jul 2007 20:08:26 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Johannes Schindelin's message of "Tue, 3 Jul 2007 00:26:37 +0100 (BST)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Johannes Schindelin writes: > WARNING: 'git lost-found' is deprecated. > WARNING: Use 'git fsck --lost-found' instead > > whenever lost-found is called? I agree that would be a sensible second step after the result of the first step matures. >> 3. git-lost-found is removed. > > Yes, that can wait. > > What is more important before doing 1&2 for real is this: lost-found ATM > calls 'git-fsck --full --no-reflogs'. The patch does not force these two > options when called with '--lost-found'. I would really appreciate > opinions on this issue, and will gladly re-prepare a patch accordingly. I think I am not following you; do you mean --lost-found does not imply these two? I am not sure if there is any benefit of being able to do --lost-found without --full nor --no-reflogs.