From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: pull into dirty working tree Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 00:49:05 -0700 Message-ID: <7vps3zascu.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.pobox.com> References: <18031.64456.948230.375333@lisa.zopyra.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Bill Lear , git@vger.kernel.org To: Linus Torvalds X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Jun 14 09:49:41 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Hyk5L-0003EE-Dw for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 09:49:39 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752599AbXFNHtJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Jun 2007 03:49:09 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752428AbXFNHtI (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Jun 2007 03:49:08 -0400 Received: from fed1rmmtao106.cox.net ([68.230.241.40]:37316 "EHLO fed1rmmtao106.cox.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752373AbXFNHtH (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Jun 2007 03:49:07 -0400 Received: from fed1rmimpo01.cox.net ([70.169.32.71]) by fed1rmmtao106.cox.net (InterMail vM.7.08.02.01 201-2186-121-102-20070209) with ESMTP id <20070614074906.VLRF3993.fed1rmmtao106.cox.net@fed1rmimpo01.cox.net>; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 03:49:06 -0400 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.pobox.com ([68.5.247.80]) by fed1rmimpo01.cox.net with bizsmtp id BKp61X0011kojtg0000000; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 03:49:07 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Linus Torvalds's message of "Wed, 13 Jun 2007 22:21:38 -0700 (PDT)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Linus Torvalds writes: > It might make it a bit easier for CVS people to get used to the git model: > keep your dirty working tree, and do "git pull" to update it, and fix up > any conflicts in the working tree. That's how CVS works - it's a bad > model, but it's a model that may be worth supporting just to get people > more easily into the _good_ model. If a bad model _is_ supported, what incentive is there for these people to move into the good model, I honestly wonder...