From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] Introduces for_each_revision() helper Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 16:19:04 -0700 Message-ID: <7vps5lbgd3.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <11776932123749-git-send-email-lcapitulino@mandriva.com.br> <1177693212202-git-send-email-lcapitulino@mandriva.com.br> <7vabwtobpg.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <20070427181326.14bbbf5c@localhost> <7vy7kbeke1.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <20070429070616.GV5942@spearce.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: "Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino" , git@vger.kernel.org To: "Shawn O. Pearce" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue May 01 01:19:21 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Hif9G-0001aD-49 for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Tue, 01 May 2007 01:19:14 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1423404AbXD3XTK (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Apr 2007 19:19:10 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1423775AbXD3XTK (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Apr 2007 19:19:10 -0400 Received: from fed1rmmtao101.cox.net ([68.230.241.45]:47685 "EHLO fed1rmmtao101.cox.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1423404AbXD3XTI (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Apr 2007 19:19:08 -0400 Received: from fed1rmimpo01.cox.net ([70.169.32.71]) by fed1rmmtao101.cox.net (InterMail vM.7.05.02.00 201-2174-114-20060621) with ESMTP id <20070430231904.UUMD1235.fed1rmmtao101.cox.net@fed1rmimpo01.cox.net>; Mon, 30 Apr 2007 19:19:04 -0400 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.5.247.80]) by fed1rmimpo01.cox.net with bizsmtp id tbK41W00Y1kojtg0000000; Mon, 30 Apr 2007 19:19:05 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20070429070616.GV5942@spearce.org> (Shawn O. Pearce's message of "Sun, 29 Apr 2007 03:06:17 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: "Shawn O. Pearce" writes: > But in_merge_base is heavyweight if the two commits are in the > same object database, but aren't connected at all. You'll need > to traverse both histories before aborting and saying there is > no merge base. That ain't cheap on large trees. But its also a > single line of code. Who said anything about "a single line of code"? That is quite different from heaviness hidden in a control structure lookalike.