Re: [PATCH] Add -q option to "git rm" to suppress output when there aren't errors.

[Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>]

Steven Grimm <koreth@midwinter.com> writes:

> Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
>> Suppressing output is understandable and probably is a useful
>> thing to do, but I do not see a justification to tie that
>> quietness to making the status unuable...
>
> The status is unusable as is, actually, for the particular use case of
> cg-admin-rewritehist. If you try to use git-rm as an index filter,
> cg-admin-rewritehist will stop running as soon as you hit a revision
> that doesn't contain the file you're looking to filter out. (If the
> file doesn't exist in the first revision in your repo, that means it
> will do no work at all.)

Probably "git-grep foo" wouldn't be suitable as the index filter
for admin-rewritehist, either, nor "git-fsck", nor many other
things.

What does it have to do with anything?

Saying "git rm --quiet foo" from the command line, wishing to
supress the output, is very understandable.

Saying "git rm --ignore-unmatch foo bar baz", wishing to remove
bar (which exists) even when foo does not exist, is also very
understandable.

I think they are pretty much independent options.