From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [RFC][RESEND][PATCH] Allow fetching from multiple repositories at once Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 12:35:19 -0700 Message-ID: <7vpsdms7ew.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <20060923164308.16334.49252.stgit@machine.or.cz> <45156780.6070801@gmail.com> <20060923170439.GQ8259@pasky.or.cz> <20060923173943.GA20017@pasky.or.cz> <20060923180539.GC20017@pasky.or.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Petr Baudis , A Large Angry SCM , git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Sep 23 21:35:26 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GRDHZ-0000si-HM for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sat, 23 Sep 2006 21:35:25 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751496AbWIWTfW (ORCPT ); Sat, 23 Sep 2006 15:35:22 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751498AbWIWTfW (ORCPT ); Sat, 23 Sep 2006 15:35:22 -0400 Received: from fed1rmmtao06.cox.net ([68.230.241.33]:50320 "EHLO fed1rmmtao06.cox.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751496AbWIWTfV (ORCPT ); Sat, 23 Sep 2006 15:35:21 -0400 Received: from fed1rmimpo01.cox.net ([70.169.32.71]) by fed1rmmtao06.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.06.01 201-2131-130-101-20060113) with ESMTP id <20060923193520.BEAV6235.fed1rmmtao06.cox.net@fed1rmimpo01.cox.net>; Sat, 23 Sep 2006 15:35:20 -0400 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.5.247.80]) by fed1rmimpo01.cox.net with bizsmtp id RvbJ1V00W1kojtg0000000 Sat, 23 Sep 2006 15:35:19 -0400 To: Johannes Schindelin In-Reply-To: (Johannes Schindelin's message of "Sat, 23 Sep 2006 20:14:28 +0200 (CEST)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Johannes Schindelin writes: > The thing is, your patch optimizes for a very special case, which special > case IMHO should be handled differently to begin with. I share the feeling, and the usual URL while spelling out the repository name but used only for the site name, because other special parameters are used to override the repository path within the site, is just too ugly.