From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: Pulling tags from git.git Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 12:31:49 -0800 Message-ID: <7vpskgkgcq.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <4dd15d180603061044h3f70d48bk8006c15e605fdca1@mail.gmail.com> <4dd15d180603061054k36d1a434se7377ded1b3240bb@mail.gmail.com> <440D5285.3050401@op5.se> <7voe0ilf25.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <440D7A7D.8070507@op5.se> <87zmk0dq75.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> <441064DD.2010903@op5.se> <87lkv5ynnp.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Mar 20 21:32:00 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FLR2m-0005U8-3p for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Mon, 20 Mar 2006 21:32:00 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030221AbWCTUb4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Mar 2006 15:31:56 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030238AbWCTUb4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Mar 2006 15:31:56 -0500 Received: from fed1rmmtao07.cox.net ([68.230.241.32]:12511 "EHLO fed1rmmtao07.cox.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030221AbWCTUbz (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Mar 2006 15:31:55 -0500 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.4.9.127]) by fed1rmmtao07.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with ESMTP id <20060320203027.EVLT3131.fed1rmmtao07.cox.net@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>; Mon, 20 Mar 2006 15:30:27 -0500 To: Florian Weimer In-Reply-To: <87lkv5ynnp.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> (Florian Weimer's message of "Mon, 20 Mar 2006 19:30:18 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Florian Weimer writes: > It's not obvious from the git-tag documentation that signing makes a > difference down the road in terms of replication. IOW, I don't > question the distinction per se, but it's counter-intuitive if you > aren't told about it. Agreed. Please make it so ;-).