From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] Tie it all together: "git log" Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2006 01:02:48 -0800 Message-ID: <7vpsl6lepz.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <7vr75nm8cl.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <46a038f90602281538m90c4d04pbb6f277e3bec89e8@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Mar 01 10:03:12 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FENEW-0000on-8L for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Wed, 01 Mar 2006 10:02:57 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964819AbWCAJCv (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Mar 2006 04:02:51 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S964856AbWCAJCv (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Mar 2006 04:02:51 -0500 Received: from fed1rmmtao03.cox.net ([68.230.241.36]:63685 "EHLO fed1rmmtao03.cox.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964819AbWCAJCu (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Mar 2006 04:02:50 -0500 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.4.9.127]) by fed1rmmtao03.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with ESMTP id <20060301090118.JOIT20875.fed1rmmtao03.cox.net@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>; Wed, 1 Mar 2006 04:01:18 -0500 To: "Martin Langhoff" In-Reply-To: <46a038f90602281538m90c4d04pbb6f277e3bec89e8@mail.gmail.com> (Martin Langhoff's message of "Wed, 1 Mar 2006 12:38:53 +1300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: "Martin Langhoff" writes: > On 3/1/06, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> I would say we should just rip merge-order out. Who uses it, >> and why does it not work with topo-order, again? > > IIRC archimport uses it, but there's no reason why topo-order wouldn't work. Thanks. I'll push out a few patches on top of Linus' series, with s/merge-order/topo-order/ on archimport.