From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Subject: Re: git-format-patch + git-applymbox small issue
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 12:23:13 -0700
Message-ID: <7vpsscweou.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
References: <20050817171844.57566.qmail@web26301.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
	<Pine.LNX.4.63.0508171931130.8623@wgmdd8.biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Aug 17 21:23:21 2005
Return-path: <git-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1E5TVO-0002Js-0O
	for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Wed, 17 Aug 2005 21:23:18 +0200
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1751211AbVHQTXP (ORCPT <rfc822;gcvg-git@m.gmane.org>);
	Wed, 17 Aug 2005 15:23:15 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751214AbVHQTXP
	(ORCPT <rfc822;git-outgoing>); Wed, 17 Aug 2005 15:23:15 -0400
Received: from fed1rmmtao04.cox.net ([68.230.241.35]:19185 "EHLO
	fed1rmmtao04.cox.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1751211AbVHQTXO (ORCPT <rfc822;git@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 17 Aug 2005 15:23:14 -0400
Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.4.9.127])
          by fed1rmmtao04.cox.net
          (InterMail vM.6.01.04.00 201-2131-118-20041027) with ESMTP
          id <20050817192314.KMEJ15197.fed1rmmtao04.cox.net@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>;
          Wed, 17 Aug 2005 15:23:14 -0400
To: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0508171931130.8623@wgmdd8.biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de>
	(Johannes Schindelin's message of "Wed, 17 Aug 2005 19:32:14 +0200
	(CEST)")
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux)
Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk
X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org

Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> writes:

> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 17 Aug 2005, Marco Costalba wrote:
>
>> P.S: I say 'revision', and 'git archive' but are very common also 
>> 'commit' and 'git repository'. This is just a silly example where a 
>> common dictionary should be useful.

I think 'commit' and 'repository' are more commonly seen here.

> How about the glossary, which I posted a few hours ago?

Which is very good.  Thanks.  Mind if I put it under
Documentation/ in its current shape?