From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH] Debian packaging for 0.99.4 Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 13:21:07 -0700 Message-ID: <7vpssiucss.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <7v8xzfde7t.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <7vr7d6z3pn.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <7vacjsdcbj.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <7vwtmw5nx7.fsf_-_@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <7vd5olqtvp.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <20050810235436.GW28270@kiste.smurf.noris.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Aug 12 22:22:13 2005 Return-path: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1E3g1h-0002UX-90 for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Fri, 12 Aug 2005 22:21:13 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932077AbVHLUVK (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Aug 2005 16:21:10 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932079AbVHLUVJ (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Aug 2005 16:21:09 -0400 Received: from fed1rmmtao09.cox.net ([68.230.241.30]:37116 "EHLO fed1rmmtao09.cox.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932077AbVHLUVI (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Aug 2005 16:21:08 -0400 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.4.9.127]) by fed1rmmtao09.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.00 201-2131-118-20041027) with ESMTP id <20050812202108.XNHU7275.fed1rmmtao09.cox.net@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>; Fri, 12 Aug 2005 16:21:08 -0400 To: Matthias Urlichs In-Reply-To: <20050810235436.GW28270@kiste.smurf.noris.de> (Matthias Urlichs's message of "Thu, 11 Aug 2005 01:54:36 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Matthias Urlichs writes: > - Split gitk off to its own package; > it needs tk installed, but nothing else does. I just noticed from "dpkg --info" output that the generated git-tk has "Architecture: i386". Shouldn't it read "all" and resulting package also named git-tk_${VERSION}_all.deb, instead of whatever architecture I happened to build it?