From: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
To: Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@gmail.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
git@vger.kernel.org, Bryan larsen <bryanlarsen@yahoo.com>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Tell vim the textwidth is 75.
Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 18:13:25 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7vpst9huq2.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050723090433.GA11814@pasky.ji.cz> (Petr Baudis's message of "Sat, 23 Jul 2005 11:04:33 +0200")
Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz> writes:
> I have it the other way around, with the rationale that your default
> settings should be in your ~/.gitrc, not environment, which is always
> the highest priority.
That's true. I just never hand commit other people's patches (I
use applymbox for that) and never needed to give one-shot set of
environment variables to commit-tree by hand from the command
line.
> (Quite some things came to git from Cogito anyway. ;-) And well, that's
> completely natural.)
I am not the one who did the barebone, so I'd let Linus to tell
"coming from" and "done independently while retaining
compatibility" apart if he wants to ;-).
>> Personally, I think having to have ignore pattern like .cvsignore
>> per-directory is simply _ugly_.
>
> No, I think it's great. That increases the locality of things, which is
> good. Think about it as of variables - it's nicer to have them local.
Seeing Catalin also expressed the intention to add .gitignore in
directory tree everywhere, I would keep my personal opinion to myself.
How about we do something like this:
git-ls-files --others
--exclude-from=.git/ignore \
--exclude-per-directory=.gitignore
When the new flag --exclude-per-directory is specified,
git-ls-files uses the file with that name in each directory it
looks at to match against the files in that directory (and its
subdirectories, perhaps?) just like it uses --exclude-from for
the entire tree today.
If I added that, would both of you be able to lose a lot of
lines from cg-status and git.__tree_status()? If so, then that
is worth the core-side support.
What should the pattern matching rules be? I think the current
git-ls-files one may be a bit too weak.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-07-24 1:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-07-21 20:23 [PATCH 1/1] Tell vim the textwidth is 75 Bryan larsen
2005-07-22 2:50 ` Junio C Hamano
2005-07-22 10:37 ` Catalin Marinas
2005-07-22 19:24 ` Sam Ravnborg
2005-07-22 20:39 ` Junio C Hamano
2005-07-22 20:59 ` Petr Baudis
2005-07-24 22:49 ` [RFC] extending git-ls-files --exclude Junio C Hamano
2005-07-24 22:50 ` [PATCH] git-ls-files: --exclude mechanism updates Junio C Hamano
2005-07-24 22:51 ` [PATCH] Documentation: describe git-ls-files --exclude patterns Junio C Hamano
2005-07-25 9:19 ` [RFC] extending git-ls-files --exclude Catalin Marinas
2005-07-25 19:58 ` Junio C Hamano
2005-07-25 20:09 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-07-25 20:27 ` Junio C Hamano
2005-07-25 20:51 ` Catalin Marinas
2005-07-28 15:57 ` Petr Baudis
2005-07-25 20:59 ` Catalin Marinas
2005-07-28 15:52 ` Petr Baudis
2005-07-28 16:04 ` A Large Angry SCM
2005-07-28 19:25 ` Matthias Urlichs
2005-07-29 7:21 ` Petr Baudis
2005-07-29 7:37 ` Matthias Urlichs
2005-07-29 13:49 ` A Large Angry SCM
2005-07-29 5:04 ` Junio C Hamano
2005-07-29 7:36 ` Petr Baudis
2005-07-29 8:24 ` Junio C Hamano
2005-07-29 8:41 ` Petr Baudis
2005-08-01 16:14 ` Wayne Scott
2005-07-29 7:50 ` [PATCH] ls-files: rework exclude patterns Junio C Hamano
2005-07-29 7:51 ` [PATCH] Documentation and tests: ls-files exclude pattern Junio C Hamano
2005-07-22 21:43 ` [PATCH 1/1] Tell vim the textwidth is 75 Catalin Marinas
2005-07-22 23:07 ` Junio C Hamano
2005-07-23 8:41 ` Catalin Marinas
2005-07-23 9:30 ` Petr Baudis
2005-07-23 10:27 ` Catalin Marinas
2005-07-23 16:33 ` Bryan Larsen
2005-07-23 20:52 ` Catalin Marinas
2005-07-28 19:47 ` Petr Baudis
2005-07-29 2:24 ` Junio C Hamano
2005-07-29 2:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-07-29 9:55 ` Catalin Marinas
2005-07-29 11:10 ` Petr Baudis
2005-07-29 12:34 ` Catalin Marinas
2005-07-30 2:11 ` Junio C Hamano
2005-07-23 9:04 ` Petr Baudis
2005-07-24 1:13 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2005-07-22 21:00 ` Catalin Marinas
2005-07-22 20:41 ` Petr Baudis
2005-07-22 21:16 ` Junio C Hamano
2005-07-22 21:27 ` Petr Baudis
2005-07-22 23:24 ` Junio C Hamano
2005-07-22 23:50 ` Petr Baudis
2005-07-23 10:32 ` Catalin Marinas
2005-07-26 0:18 ` Updating diff-raw status letter to 'A' for added files Junio C Hamano
2005-07-26 0:20 ` [PATCH 1/2] Use symbolic constants for diff-raw status indicators Junio C Hamano
2005-07-26 0:21 ` [PATCH 2/2] diff-raw: Use 'A' instead of 'N' for added files Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7vpst9huq2.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net \
--to=junkio@cox.net \
--cc=bryanlarsen@yahoo.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pasky@suse.cz \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).