From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Apr 2013, #04; Fri, 12) Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 15:56:06 -0700 Message-ID: <7vr4ifbbp5.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <7vehefctrf.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <51688AF8.3010200@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Jakub =?utf-8?Q?Nar=C4=99bski?= X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Apr 13 00:56:35 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UQmtT-0008Br-N6 for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Sat, 13 Apr 2013 00:56:32 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758748Ab3DLW4M convert rfc822-to-quoted-printable (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Apr 2013 18:56:12 -0400 Received: from b-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com ([208.72.237.35]:52355 "EHLO smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752823Ab3DLW4J convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Apr 2013 18:56:09 -0400 Received: from smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by b-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6E5916E17; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 22:56:08 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=Rb1xFVP1PqWV Nu4V1j5etGTeQmo=; b=s41O5BbVLx/5AvRcGwo22IzGU+5kx9o7zHsqw8Gzx/Id zf5W3QcGG7mhIJ5eFRbJCQMCcQHnohsTKwvM6kxx81wIzuW+r5KlYL6UeqQBqIQ7 NBBChgX/+h2X4VYnYMEV4OrJUgdfvIsGeqwGbO1GV3OjW+ZTfAxVoLOVObBvgeM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=sasl; b=o1rOic Gl1/bMgos2ZWRiCcU/xt1PAyU8zTMPu/IqRA/FpVCN5JeDm2REMb1P+anh8lfXJe EvlMe6f3ye8xl+0Esjs2gSf5kwgStiBOkYOzUouDaG9SJ+8/DFj2QSkby8qNsV7Q 4eqtmCMXNEEUBSFhRT4RTqU+H4gZtEfxgZrlM= Received: from b-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by b-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DDBC16E16; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 22:56:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [24.4.35.13]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by b-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1949716E15; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 22:56:08 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <51688AF8.3010200@gmail.com> ("Jakub =?utf-8?Q?Nar=C4=99bski?= =?utf-8?Q?=22's?= message of "Sat, 13 Apr 2013 00:30:16 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 2995EC1C-A3C4-11E2-9A97-8341C8FBB9E7-77302942!b-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Jakub Nar=C4=99bski writes: > So mc/count-objects-kibibytes is to be discarded, or merged to 'maste= r'? I asked for opinions, not questions ;-) I am on the fence, but slightly in favor of dropping it. I suspect some scripts will get unexpectedly hurt, just like we had to patch cvsimport. Among the human users who deeply care about the output between "kilobytes" and "KiB", nobody would want "684322 KiB" the "kibibytes" topic would give; people who care will likely to use "-H" to obtain "668.28 MiB" instead.